Just Accepted: The GRoLTS-checklist; Guidelines for Reporting on Latent Trajectory Studies

Abstract

Estimating models within the mixture model framework, like Latent Growth Mixture Modeling (LGMM) or Latent Class Growth Analysis (LCGA), involves making various decisions throughout the estimation process. This has led to a high variety of how results of latent trajectory analysis are reported. To overcome this issue, using a four-round Delphi study, we developed Guidelines for Reporting on Latent Trajectory Studies (GRoLTS). The purpose of GRoLTS is to present criteria that should be included when reporting the results of latent trajectory analysis across research fields. We have gone through a systematic process to identify key components that, according to a panel of experts, are necessary when reporting results for trajectory studies. We applied GRoLTS to 38 papers where LGMM/LCGA was used to study trajectories of post-traumatic stress after a traumatic event.

tabel

Papers (%) fulfilling individual GRoLTS items. Note: total number of papers examined for systematic review is N=38, exact percentages given in green bar

grolts

Van de Schoot, R., Sijbrandij, M., Winter, S. D., Depaoli, S. & Vermunt, J. K. (2016). The GRoLTS-Checklist: Guidelines for Reporting on Latent Trajectory Studies. Structural Equation Modeling, 1–17. doi:10.1080/10705511.2016.1247646
PDF  Additional Information

 

One response to “Just Accepted: The GRoLTS-checklist; Guidelines for Reporting on Latent Trajectory Studies

  1. Pingback: M&S powersnack: Join us and get food for thought! | Rens van de Schoot

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s