I have began uploading additional information for each of my papers. This additional information can consist of (1) data sets, syntax files; (2) more information about the paper because it was not clearly described in the paper; (3) a discussion about how analyses should have been conducted given new developments or after getting new insights; and (4) errata of (minor) mistakes. It may seem that with publishing additional information I am a sloppy scientist, however, I believe in honesty and full transparency. Why can books have new editions and websites where errata are published, but scientific papers can never be updated? Therefore, I decided to change the way scientific articles are typically considered. I would very much like to invite fellow researchers to let me know if you want me to publish additional information for one of my papers. Thanks in advance for improving science!
- Basisschooldocenten gezocht voor expert panel
- Moeten wetenschappers uit hun ivoren toren verhuizen naar een glazen huis op de markt?
- New in our Mplus Summer School: Should we retract all our papers with cross-lagged panel models?
- New in our Mplus Summer School: a full day on Mediation Analysis by Milica Miočević
- Sneak peek Mplus Summer School: Why the first day will feel like a roller-coaster
Follow me on TwitterMy Tweets
TagsBayesian Estimation Bayesian statistics Big-Thinking Blavaan burn survivors bursary students DAC deep thinking DIC DJA DSEM EJDP expert knowledge FFP Friday GrOLTS Jonge Akademie KNAW Lcga Lgmm Longitudinal data analysis Mixture modeling Mplus multilevel analaysis ongelijkheid PhD posterior predictive p-value ppp-value priors promoveren protest Psychotraumatology Ptsd QRP Questionable Research replication Review SEM small samples special issue StatsCamp Summer School WAMBS